Dr.eidiani's personal website

فارسي

Personal
	Birth Date: March 21, 1972						Birth Certificate : 135445			Father Name: Ghadir
	Issued: Mashad, Iran						Sex: Male			Marital Status: Married
Education
	1997-2003	Ph. D. student in Electrical Eng.							Azad University of Campus of Science and Research-Tehran-Iran
	Courses Taken					27 credits			GPA: 18.28 / 20
	Comprehensive Exam					15 credits			GPA: 17 / 20
	1995-1997	M. S. in Electrical Engineering							Ferdowsi University, Mashad, Iran
	Courses Taken					35 credits			GPA: 18.51 / 20
	1991-1995	B. S. in Electrical Engineering							Ferdowsi University, Mashad, Iran
	Courses Taken					151 credits			GPA: 17.48 / 20
Industrial
Experiences	2001-2005		Collaborating with Electric Company .								Iran
	2001-2005		Member of Iranian Organization for Engineering Order of Building								Mashad - IRAN
	2001-2003		Member of Young Research Club								Tehran - IRAN
	2003-2005		Collaborating with Electric Company of Mashad								Mashad - IRAN
Academic
	1997-2003				Educator			Azad University of , Iran
Experiences	2001-2003				Lecturer			Sadjad Institute, Mashad, Iran
	1996-1997				Lecturer			Azad University of Gonabad, Iran
	1995-1996				Lecturer			Junior College of Montazeri, Mahad, Iran
Master Works	Project Research			2005: Reduce short circuit in Khorasan System (Software: DIgSILENT Power Factory - Important: Reliability) 2003: Fast and Accurate Method for Computing ATC 2002: Asynchronous Motor Vector Control 2001: Stochastic Power Flow 2000: Load Forecasting with ANN
	Palmary			2005: Reviewer of Int. PSC Iran 2003-2005: Reviewer of IEEE PES 2003:Reviewer of 7’th IASTED International Conference, Palm Spiring, USA, 24-26 Feb. 2003. 1998-2002: A potentially qualified candidate for inclusion in the 1998 and 2002 edition of International Who's Who
	Awards			1998: 2^sc Ferdowsi Science-Research Festival (Palmary Research – Grade: 2) 1999-2003: Preferential Researcher in University 2001: Grade One of Invited Educator in Sanat-Ab-O-Bargh 2002: 4^th Khwarizmi Young Festival (Palmary Research) 2003: 4^th Ferdowsi Science-Research Festival (Palmary Research – Grade: 2) 2003: Preferential Researcher in Azad University in section 9 (Khorasan) – Grade 1

Interests

Power System Restructuring, Deregulation, Competitive Electric Markets
Available Transmission Capability, Transmission Pricing, Interconnected Operations Services
Frequency and Voltage Control of Deregulated Power Systems, Control Performance Criterions
Power System Security, Contingency Assessment
Power System Dynamics, Transient Stability, Voltage Stability
Power System Planning, Risk Management
Power System Operation
Power System Reliability
DIgSILENT Power Factory
Nonlinear Control

Courses Taken

Courses Taken in Ph.D. Period: 27 Credits, GPA: 18.28

Course Name

Point/20

Course Name

Point/20

Real Analysis 1,2

17.5-18.5

Deregulation

18.5

Stochastic Control

19

Robot Control

18

Reliability

20

Mathematical Eng.

16

Nonlinear Power Sys. Dynamics

19

Power System Planning

18

Courses Taken in M.S. Period: 35 Credits, GPA: 18.51

Course Name

Point/20

Course Name

Point/20

Linear Modern Control

19

Power Sys. Operation

17.5

Linear Power System Dynamics

19

Elec. Machines Theory

16.5

Nonlinear Control

18

Seminar

17.5

Linear & Nonlinear Programming

18.5

Thesis

19.25

Advanced Eng. Math.

19

Courses Taken in B.S. Period

Humanities Courses

24 Credits

_________________________________________________________________________

Basic Courses

115 Credits

Including:

Calculus I & II, Ordinary Differential Equation, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Numerical Computation, Computer Programming. Physics I & II & III, Electromagnetic, Electric Circuit Theory I & II, Logic Circuit Theory, Electrical Measuring Instrument, Electronic I & II, Industrial Electronic. Signal and System, Linear System Control. Electrical Machinery I & II & III, Special Electrical Machinery, Power System Analysis I & II, Power Plants, Power System Protection and Relaying, High Voltage Insulators, Designing Transmission line, etc.

_________________________________________________________________________

Optional Courses

12 Credits

Including:

Engineering Economy Reactive Power control, High voltage Substation, Industrial Control.

151 Credits, GPA: 17.48

Theses Abstract

M.S. Thesis

12 credit

Point: 19.25

Title: CTSA & POMP TWO NEW METHODS FOR DIRECT ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT STABILITY

Abstract: This paper proposes two new approaches for transient stability analysis. These approaches use Athay’s PEBS . The first method is a combination of simulation and Athay’s PEBS that it's called Complex Transient Stability Analysis (CTSA). CTSA is more reliable than all existing methods that use unstable equilibrium point (UEP) as it doesn’t use any convergence methods .POMP's method (Point of Maximum Potential Energy) follows the point of maximum potential energy on post-fault system trajectory. This point is found using Taylor's expansion series up to the second order. CTSA, POMP and Athay's PEBS methods are compared by applying fault on 4 and 7 machines networks.

Ph.D. Proposal Project

24 credits

Point: 20

Title: Fast and Accurate Method for Computing Available Transfer Capability

Order 889 mandated each control area to compute ATC and post them on a communication system called the Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS). Approaches of computing ATC can be divided into the following groups: static methods and dynamic methods.

PROPOSALS

(1-1) Presenting a method for transient and voltage stability assessment SIMULTANIOUSLY.

(1-1-1): Using energy function for transient and voltage stability assessment simultaneously. [3,4] (We know methods only based on energy methods are not accurate)

(1-1-2): Adopting of existing Transient and Voltage stability analysis.

(1-2) Determining relation between “Dangerous Contingency” and “Stable Operating Point”. (If time permits)

The “Dangerous contingency" in base case (first stable operating point) and ATC case (when system reaches termination criteria) are not necessarily the same. Stable operating points in base case and ATC case are different. Then we must determine a simple relation between dangerous contingency and stable operating point.

(1-3) Presenting a fast method for dangerous contingency assessment.

Here we should try to combine the best methods for transient stability and voltage stability contingency screening and ranking. Maybe we will try the Athay’s or POMP’s method for transient stability but we should leave it open to use other methods for both transient and voltage stability. Two new approaches for transient stability analysis are proposed. These approaches use Athay’s PEBS.

(1-3-1) CTSA (Complex Transient Stability Analysis): The first method, called CTSA, uses complex simulation and Athay’s PEBS. CTSA is more reliable than all existing methods that use unstable equilibrium point (UEP), as it doesn’t use any convergence methods. [1].

(1-3-2) POMP (Point of Maximum Potential Energy): POMP's method follows the point of maximum potential energy on post-fault system trajectory. This point is found using Taylor's expansion series up to the second order. [2]

(1-4) The proposed method should be able to calculate:

(1-4-1) SET-TO-SET: where a set may be an interchange area or any other arbitrary set of buses.

(1-4-2) BUS-TO-BUS: bilateral contracts

(1-4-3) SET-TO-BUS: multiple suppliers or an area (or a GENCO) to an individual customer

(1-4-4) BUS-TO-SET: single supplier to a customer with multiple locations.

Course Name	Point/20	Course Name	Point/20
Real Analysis 1,2	17.5-18.5	Deregulation	18.5
Stochastic Control	19	Robot Control	18
Reliability	20	Mathematical Eng.	16
Nonlinear Power Sys. Dynamics	19	Power System Planning	18

Humanities Courses		24 Credits
_________________________________________________________________________
Basic Courses	115 Credits
Including: Calculus I & II, Ordinary Differential Equation, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Numerical Computation, Computer Programming. Physics I & II & III, Electromagnetic, Electric Circuit Theory I & II, Logic Circuit Theory, Electrical Measuring Instrument, Electronic I & II, Industrial Electronic. Signal and System, Linear System Control. Electrical Machinery I & II & III, Special Electrical Machinery, Power System Analysis I & II, Power Plants, Power System Protection and Relaying, High Voltage Insulators, Designing Transmission line, etc.
_________________________________________________________________________
Optional Courses	12 Credits
Including: Engineering Economy Reactive Power control, High voltage Substation, Industrial Control.

M.S. Thesis	12 credit	Point: 19.25
Title: CTSA & POMP TWO NEW METHODS FOR DIRECT ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT STABILITY Abstract: This paper proposes two new approaches for transient stability analysis. These approaches use Athay’s PEBS . The first method is a combination of simulation and Athay’s PEBS that it's called Complex Transient Stability Analysis (CTSA). CTSA is more reliable than all existing methods that use unstable equilibrium point (UEP) as it doesn’t use any convergence methods .POMP's method (Point of Maximum Potential Energy) follows the point of maximum potential energy on post-fault system trajectory. This point is found using Taylor's expansion series up to the second order. CTSA, POMP and Athay's PEBS methods are compared by applying fault on 4 and 7 machines networks.
Ph.D. Proposal Project	24 credits		Point: 20
Title: Fast and Accurate Method for Computing Available Transfer Capability Order 889 mandated each control area to compute ATC and post them on a communication system called the Open Access Same-Time Information System (OASIS). Approaches of computing ATC can be divided into the following groups: static methods and dynamic methods. PROPOSALS (1-1) Presenting a method for transient and voltage stability assessment SIMULTANIOUSLY. (1-1-1): Using energy function for transient and voltage stability assessment simultaneously. [3,4] (We know methods only based on energy methods are not accurate) (1-1-2): Adopting of existing Transient and Voltage stability analysis. (1-2) Determining relation between “Dangerous Contingency” and “Stable Operating Point”. (If time permits) The “Dangerous contingency" in base case (first stable operating point) and ATC case (when system reaches termination criteria) are not necessarily the same. Stable operating points in base case and ATC case are different. Then we must determine a simple relation between dangerous contingency and stable operating point. (1-3) Presenting a fast method for dangerous contingency assessment. Here we should try to combine the best methods for transient stability and voltage stability contingency screening and ranking. Maybe we will try the Athay’s or POMP’s method for transient stability but we should leave it open to use other methods for both transient and voltage stability. Two new approaches for transient stability analysis are proposed. These approaches use Athay’s PEBS. (1-3-1) CTSA (Complex Transient Stability Analysis): The first method, called CTSA, uses complex simulation and Athay’s PEBS. CTSA is more reliable than all existing methods that use unstable equilibrium point (UEP), as it doesn’t use any convergence methods. [1]. (1-3-2) POMP (Point of Maximum Potential Energy): POMP's method follows the point of maximum potential energy on post-fault system trajectory. This point is found using Taylor's expansion series up to the second order. [2] (1-4) The proposed method should be able to calculate: (1-4-1) SET-TO-SET: where a set may be an interchange area or any other arbitrary set of buses. (1-4-2) BUS-TO-BUS: bilateral contracts (1-4-3) SET-TO-BUS: multiple suppliers or an area (or a GENCO) to an individual customer (1-4-4) BUS-TO-SET: single supplier to a customer with multiple locations.